in

Better Off Dad

I am a stay at home dad. That’s pretty much all I am. I used to be other things before I started staying home with my kids. But now I’m just a stay at home dad, or SAHD for short. I know that’s what I am because that’s how people introduce me. “This is Marcus, he stays home with the kids (can you believe it?)” Or if they’re over the age of 55, I usually get the “He’s a Mr. Mom.” It’s said in a positive way, sort of like the way people say “between jobs” when they mean “fired for being an incompetent loser.”

October 2009 - Posts

  • Lingering Beauty

     
    A couple of days ago I met a friend of mine at Target for coffee.

    I know, that seems really sad.  What kind of loser has to meet for coffee at a Target?  Well, I’ll tell you what kind:  The kind that has some shopping to do.  The kind that needs a place for the kids to play while said coffee is consumed.  And finally, the kind that has a Target coupon for $2.00 off a Pumpkin Spice Latte.

    Anyway, I was sitting there talking with my friend, who happens to be female,  (that’s right, we were having a torrid affair in the Target snack bar.  You should see what we do at the Safeway Deli counter) and the kids were eating teddy grahams and generally keeping the squabbling to a minimum.

    Well, in the midst of this scene, an old man came over to us.   He appeared to be in his sixties or early seventies.  He walked over to where we’re sitting and said something innocuous, I don’t quite remember what.  It was the kind of thing that old people are always coming up and saying:

    “Oh, aren’t they adorable.”

    “They grow up so quickly.”

    “I bet they’re a handful.”

    It was the kind of comment that, to me, is just one more throw away pleasantry, but to the person saying it, probably brims over with memories over their own children in a lifetime past. 

    This time, like most times, I didn’t think much of it.  It was the kind of comment that was said in passing – a quick hello and a fleeting smile.

    But he didn’t leave.

    He just stood there for a second, staring at the kids.  Then, he said, “You know, I had seven kids: five girls and two boys.”

    We all smiled at this -  so much meaning wrapped up in a simple phrase.  It was easy to imagine this man’s household brimming over with seven children, the girls his little angels, the boys his little men.  There would be times when the pure chaos of curling irons and facepowder and getting ready for prom would drive the three males of the household into a corner just to escape.  And there would also be those times when the two boys might come home, rough and tumble from a corner football game, enough testosterone fueled energy arising from the two of them to drown out the noise of a hundred sisters.

    No, it wasn’t hard to imagine how he looked back on these years of chaos with a slightly damp eyed affection.  He was surely remembering nights of laughter around the new television and mornings of solemnity at church.  There were tears after one of the girl’s break-ups and stoic sadness when his son didn’t make the team.  There had been weddings and Christmas dinners and enough stories to last him well into his golden years and beyond.  I saw that in his eyes, his eyes that were becoming wetter by the moment.  But then he said something I didn’t expect, and the images changed.

    “Yep, seven kids.  I had to raise them all by myself, you know.”

    The smile on my face darkened as it reflected these new images and I saw more clearly what those burgeoning tears really meant.

    “She died, when she was only 48.”

    He didn’t say what happened.  He didn’t have to.  It wasn’t important.  It could have been cancer, or a car accident or a hundred other trivial causes.  It didn’t matter.  It simply mattered that she was gone.

    “She was so beautiful,” he mumbled, his voice starting to crack.  “She was the most beautiful woman I had ever seen.  I couldn’t ever get over the fact that she chose me.”

    He fumbled in his pocket for his wallet.  It was an old nylon wallet.  The kind that was popular in the 80s, with a velcro strip to hold it closed.  The kind no one would buy now a days.

    The wallet was thin, impossibly thin.  This wasn’t someone who had credit cards or shopping club memberships, or coupons; just a few dollars and maybe a drivers license.  He opened the wallet, the velcro tearing as he pulled on it, and held it toward us.  In the plastic sleeve was a single picture.  It was an old picture.  The kind they took in the seventies where the colors and slight blurriness made everything look slightly surreal.  It was faded a little around the edges, but all in all in good shape.  It had clearly been well taken care of.

    It was a simple picture, a snapshot taken at home for no particular purpose.  It showed him and his wife sitting on an old flowered couch.  He was in the picture sitting right there, but you almost didn’t notice.  Our eyes, like anyone’s would be, were drawn to the wife.

    She was beautiful.

    Behind the large framed glasses and out of style dress was an attractive woman with bright eyes smiling under the blue eyeshadow.  He was there smiling too, as pleased then, as he was now, that she had actually chosen him.

    He pulled the wallet back, folding it up carefully and sticking it back in his pocket.  I mumbled something about how beautiful his wife was and he smiled, still proud.  And then, he took one more look at my kids, said something else about how cute they were, or how quickly they grow up and then he simply said goodbye and started making his way toward the door, the tears coming on full now.

    We were left sitting there, his grief and his memories still lingering around the table.

    His wife has been dead for at least twenty years, maybe thirty and yet, his grief was right there on the surface.  It took little more than the image of a few children playing to bring it all back. 

    I thought about this man who, for two to three decades, has been grieving the death of his spouse.  He was like a character from a novel, incapable of moving past losing the great love of his life. 

    How many times must he have looked at that picture over the years? 

    How many times must he have shown it to total strangers?

    His grief was right there on the surface, waiting for the slightest incident to rub it raw once again, never disappearing long enough for the scars to heal.

    I can only imagine how great his sadness must have been when she first died, but eventually the demands of life would have taken over.  There was a job he had to go to, because the family needed money and then there were all those kids to raise.  I’m sure many of his friends told him to get remarried, but he wouldn’t even consider it.  He had already found his one true love, and she was gone.

    Eventually his joy and pride in his children would obscure his pain.  He would revel in watching them grow up and seeing their mother slowly come to the surface in the curve of a nose or the certain pronunciation of a word, or in a particular gait in the way she ran.

    Eventually, the kids would move out.  One day it would just be him and his youngest daughter sitting around the dinner table, and then, eventually, he would be alone.

    The house that had seemed to almost burst at the seems with the screams and joy of seven children and two loving adults, would now seem hollow and empty, with only the slight echo of memories to stir it.

    Eventually there would be grandchildren, each one exhibiting at least one aspect of his beloved wife, carrying her beauty on for another generation.

    And then, there would come retirement - the busyness of his days gone, his children out beginning their own lives, his grandchildren growing up and spending less and less time over at grandpas.  He would enter his golden years alone. 

    Decades ago he had stood on his wedding day thinking about everything that was to come and he surely imagined the glory of these years, sitting with his beautiful wife on the porch, drinking coffee, reading the paper, holding hands.

    And now, he’s largely just left alone with his memories, carrying them snugly in his pocket in a beaten up, out of style wallet.  Now that the quiet is here, years of sadness and longing creep out of the darkness and buzz near the surface – arising at the least expected moments – while watching TV, or driving past an old restaurant, or when watching some young children play at a Target.

    He’s sad, but he’s not sorry.  He knows that he had something that few other people ever got a glimpse of.  In a world of divorce and cheating and a dangerous complacency that seems to attack even the happiest of marriages, he knows that he had something special.

    He had found “the one.”  He had what every young man and woman is searching for, but so few ever seem to find.  And yes, his one in a million romance ended sooner than he wanted, but still it was there, and in those few cherished years they had, they produced enough children, enough memories and enough joy to carry him through to the end of his days.

    We live in a world where true love is, if not dead, at least muffled.  Our news and televisions are full of stories of romance gone wrong.  Self help books teach us to love ourselves and to deal with marriage as a compromise, or as a false ideal that has fallen short.  As many marriages fail as survive and of those who do make it, few people are so naïve as to expect that the passion of the early years will still be around decades later.

    But this man proves that maybe all that is wrong. 

    Life isn’t easy and love and marriage are rarely as simplistic as the images in our heads.  But I do know this, I love my wife.  She is the perfect match for my strengths and weaknesses and many neurosis.  We are happy together and she is the person I most want to be with, and yet the privilege of having her in my life often seems less like a gift and more like a given – something that I can take for granted.

    As sad as this man seemed, I want to be more like him.  I want to live a life so full and so bursting with affection, that the loss of that would forever alter me.

    We, so often, live safe lives, too afraid to really love or to really give ourselves to something, because we live in fear that the potential for pain might be to great.

    I don’t want to think about losing my beloved wife, a woman who is so beautiful and who I still sometimes can’t believe was willing to marry me.  But I do want to live in such a way that if I lost her it would devastate me.  I want to live so fully, so passionately, so irrationally in love, that if I were to lose that love, I would be mourning it for the rest of my life.

    I can’t say that this is how I am living now.  I too easily succumb to safety and complacency.  But every now and then I get nudged, reminded that safety and easiness has few downsides, but also few great rewards.

    I want to risk it. 

    I want to live as if every day were a gift I may never get again. 

    I want to be an old man who accosts people in Target with pictures of my lovely wife and tells them of our great, great love and inspires them to shoot for something just as life altering, just as dangerous, just as outrageously extraordinary.

    Something so beautiful that they can’t even believe they said yes.

     

  • Sing at Home Dad

     
    As most of you know, I’m a stay at home dad.

    If you didn’t know that, then perhaps my blog posts will make more sense now.

    Anyway, being a stay at home dad, I am naturally interested in how the media is portraying the stay at home dad (SAHD).  For instance, when the local news runs a story on “this new phenomenon of men, staying home with their children…” is it a generally positive thing, or a story about how so many men are unemployed thanks to the economy.

    Or when a new sitcom comes out featuring a SAHD is he a kind, hardworking, but easily frustrated Dad like every sitcom mom ever written, or is he a bumbling, selfish, mentally deficient, forgetful idiot like every sitcom dad ever written.

    It’s just good to know how society views you.

    Which is why I was very surprised and curious when a fellow SAHD friend of mine called up and told me he was driving along, flipping radio stations and heard a country song about a SAHD called “Mr. Mom.”

    (No way this ends well.)

    I immediately went and looked up the lyrics online.  The song is by a group called Lonestar which is basically a group of four guys in tight jeans who sing through their noses a lot.  The song is about some redneck dad who loses his job, probably for spitting his chewin’ tabaccy on the floor or something, so he becomes Mr. Mom (a phrase, all of us SAHDs really love).  And, not surprisingly, screws up the whole endeavor.  Here’s the chorus:

    Pampers melt in a Maytag dryer
    Crayons go up one drawer higher
    Rewind Barney for the fifteenth time
    Breakfast, six naps at nine
    There's bubble gum in the baby's hair
    Sweet potatoes in my lazy chair
    Been crazy all day long and it's only Monday
    Mr. Mom

    The song goes on to talk about what an incompetent moron the dad is and how he just can’t figure out how his wife does it, blah blah blah.

    But words alone can only make a man look so idiotic, so they created a video.

    A cartoon video.

    It’s basically 4 minutes of a bumbling idiot constantly breaking things, burning things, getting peed on, destroying the house, losing the baby etc. 

    I’ll show you the video, but I warn you, the tune is damn catchy.  And you do NOT want to find yourself singing it later.

     

    The most disturbing thing about this song is that it apparently achieved a level of ubiquity such that Alvin and the Chipmunks recorded a version of it.  There’s no accompanying video, but if you want to hear how the song can be made even more annoying than it is already, feel free to give it a listen.

     

    So, after watching this and being reminded of why I moved out of the South I began to wonder about what else might be out there about us cultural oddities: the stay at home dads of America.

    I was pleasantly surprised to find that the other songs on “the youtubes” are actually somewhat positive.  Sure there’s some poking fun, but overall the tone is “dad does a pretty good job, despite the fact that changing diapers sucks” versus “Dad is a semi-literate moron who is incapable of taking care of his children by the very nature of his y chromosome.”

    This first one is by a kid’s singer.  It is very sweet although it begins with a truly bizarre segment where he talks to a puppet that he made for $3.87 with leftover scraps from his grandma’s sewing closet and is apparently voiced by a mentally impaired care bear.  That being said, the song and video itself are actually very charming although the “dad” has a creepy moustache that makes him look like the animatronic mannequin at the Wilbur and Orville Wright 1920s airplane museum.

    Check it out.


    Very nice.

    But I have to tell you, my favorite Stay at home dad music video of all time (how did that even become a genre?) is this one below.  I like it because it’s by a real stay at home dad and because it totally rocks!

    So, there you go.  You have just been on a tour of perhaps every stay at home Dad music video in existence. 

    Isn’t your day that much better now?

    (“I get high on baby hugs” – ha ha, cracks me up)

    And just for the record, in the four hours is has taken me to finish this blog I have also done the following:

    • Made breakfast
    • Put my daughter on the bus
    • Put the dog in and out three times
    • Taken care of my son with the fever
    • Researched energy efficient heat pump water heaters
    • Folded some laundry
    • Changed three diarrhea filled diapers on the son without the fever
    • Made a doctor’s appointment
    • Made 9 calls about heat pump water heaters
    • Drank 3 cups of coffee, a Diet Dr.Pepper, a V8 and a glass of orange juice
    • Talked to 8 people who had no idea what a heat pump water heater was
    • Taken 2 aspirin
    • Wiped some indecipherable green sludge off the kitchen floor
    • Checked email 12 times
    • Called my wife and told her everything I didn’t know about heat pump water heaters
    • Washed my hands 7 times
    • Fantasized about the glamorous life of being a famous stay at home dad Children’s singer
    • Said, “Micah, leave Asher alone please” 417 times
    • Checked the want ads for a position as a stay at home Children’s singer
    • Repaired the computer wireless connection
    • Ordered a Christmas present for my brother
    • Hugged my boys 6 times

    Just one more morning in the life of a stay at home dad

    “That’s right, I take care of my children.”

  • Wild Thing! You Make My Heart…. Slowly Begin to Cry Tears of Liquid Despair

     
    I was excited about the new movie of “Where the Wild Things Are.”

    If you had asked me if I thought that making a movie out of one of the world’s more beloved children’s books was a good idea, I would have said no.  The book is too short and movie makers don’t seem particularly adept at effectively creating new plotlines out of short children’s stories (Cat in the Hat anyone?)

    So, I didn’t think dragging poor Max and his wolf suit through the movie machine was all that great of an idea.  The chances of it turning out badly seemed astronomical.  I can only imagine how many times someone pitched the idea of a movie where Robin Williams and Chris Rock voiced the wild things as wacky smart aleck creatures and Max would be played by Macaulay Culkin’s great nephew.

    Pratfalls anyone?

    It sounded bad.

    Funny maybe.  Marginally interesting to watch, maybe, but bad.  Sort of like a deep fried Reese cup covered in funnel cake.  I like all of those things, and I would probably like them together, but they also sort of make you want to throw up a little bit after you’ve swallowed it, if only to save your arteries.

    So, I can only say that I was thrilled when I saw the preview:

    I almost cried.

    That’s right.  I’m an adult watching a two minute series of video clips designed to make me part with $10 and I almost cried. 

    It was that beautiful.

    It was all the pain and longing and joy of childhood all rolled into a two minute clip with some pretty cool music that I instantly wanted to download.  The preview was, in short, absolutely brilliant and instantly reassured me that this movie was going to be something special.

    It also communicated something else to me:

    Don’t take the kids!

    Yes, it’s a movie based on a children’s book.  Yes, it features a young boy and a bunch of giant muppets and yes, everything about it on paper seems like you should take your children to it.

    BUT DO NOT!

    This is a kids movie in the same way that Children of the Corn is.  Yes, it has children in it, but….

    Being exceedingly intelligent, I was able to decipher this fact from the preview, apparently lots of other parents were not.  I read through some of the message boards about this movie and it seems that lots of parents were expecting this movie to be like the crappy one starring Robin Williams that I described earlier.

    The thing is that this movie is not fun.  It is not humorous.  I’m not even sure I would say the movie was enjoyable.

    It was brilliant though.  I thought it beautifully captured the characters and the themes of the book and difficult turmoil of a young boy whose life is nothing like the young children we see in most children’s books, but far too much like the lives of many, many children in this country.

    He is lonely and sad and angry and frightened and trying to make sense of a world that seems to have promised a wacky enjoyable life starring Jim Belushi as the goofy but bumbling father and instead ended up in a paycheck to paycheck blue collar dystopia with a single mother trying to find her own happy ending.

    I liked the movie.  I thought it was extremely well done.  I suspect it will get nominated for an Oscar.  But it is horribly depressing. 

    It’s like American Beauty with muppets. 

    It is both brilliant and depressing because it is so real.  Sure, it involves 8 foot stuffed animals who live in giant thatched spheres, but on an emotional level it is 100% realistic. 

    Too realistic.

    For the people who resonated with this movie, it is because it touched on the same feelings of anxiety, alienation and hollowness that may have populated their own childhood.

    It is also real in that these problems were not wrapped up neatly at the end.  The father does not come back.  The monsters are not happy at the end.  And the lessons that are learned are lessons of pain and understanding. 

    When the credits roll, I knew that the characters were a little better off than when they started, but that pain was still there.  The pain that seemed to linger beneath the surface of every single character on screen was still there at the end of the movie.  Maybe the characters understood their pain a little more, but it didn’t disappear.

    All in all, a great kids’ flick.

    Again, I can’t say I enjoyed the movie, (in the same way that I don’t tend to “enjoy” most things that horribly depress me) but I’m glad I saw it. 

    We spend most of our lives trying to pretend that unpleasant things in life are not there.  We isolate ourselves from poverty by living in nice neighborhoods.  We try to avoid the morose co-workers that never seem to be happy.  We make an effort to attend churches, schools, and shopping centers that are populated by as few people as possible who are struggling on a daily basis with the pain that comes of a life lived on the edge. 

    We pretend that the pain of others is not there, in hopes that this will keep our own pain at bay and keep new pain from cropping up.

    For the week after I saw this movie, I saw the pain.  Everywhere I went I was deeply and intuitively aware of the pain.

    It was like when you have just bought a new car, you begin to see all the other cars on the road that are just like yours.  You hadn’t even noticed that that many similar cars were out there, but now you see them everywhere.

    I could see the pain everywhere.

    When I read the news, I was intently aware of the people these stories were about and the sadness that must be engulfing them as they go through the loss of a husband, or a job, or a future.

    I could see the hidden pain in the people around me.  I saw it in the old man walking slowly down the sidewalk, his head almost resting on his chest.  I saw it in the cashier who rarely made eye contact as she scanned purchase after purchase into my cart.  I saw it in the teenagers walking home from high school, their defiance and bravado attempting to mask a world of hurt.

    How many of them would have loved to sail away to an island where there were no rules, where they could abandon their responsibilities and be as wild as they wanted. 

    How many of them would end up discovering that pain, like happiness, isn’t geographical and that it follows you whether you are home in your room or in the midst of the Wild Things.  Sure you can hold that pain at bay for a little while by having a wild rumpus, or going to a baseball game, or redoing your kitchen, but in the end, more often than not, that pain is still there, waiting.

    This sadness began to creep all over me, even though much of it wasn’t even my sadness, I was simply being battered by the waves of other people’s agony. 

    And I was angry.

    I was angry at all this pain - frustrated that we live in a world that seems to be full of more sadness than joy.

    I was angry at the world - angry at people for letting it get this way and angry at God for not doing anything about it.

    All because of a stupid movie.

    But not really.  A movie, a good movie at least, simply illuminates what is already there.  A great movie, illuminates those things that we so actively try to conceal.

    This was a great movie. 

    It was powerful.

    Depressing, but powerful. 

    It’s not for children.  It’s probably not even for most adults. 

    And you see, here’s my complaint.  I’m not asking for a Hollywood ending where the problems are all solved.  And I’m not asking for a cartoonish kid’s movie with jokes about bodily functions.

    All I’m asking for is what I thought the preview said was coming.

    I wanted a movie that celebrated all of the pain and longing and joy of childhood, but the problem is, they left out the joy.

    And that’s just sad.

  • Costume Conundrum

     
    Halloween is next week.  I know this because the Christmas decorations are not out yet. 

    And like any good father I have been searching for costumes for my children.  Last year I had the brilliant idea that our whole family go as the Incredibles.  Even more impressive, I had the idea in February so I was able to get a lot of the costumes on clearance.  And so the whole family suited up and we looked very cool. 

    Everyone wanted to be us.

    This year I was thinking of a similar fun idea.  I am very aware that we probably don’t have too many more years where we could do a family Halloween theme.  At some point the kids will want to be their own characters and then we’ll have to give it up.

    Apparently that started this year.

    I wanted to do Scooby Doo.  We had the right number of people to pull it off and I wanted to be able to say “Zoinks” and “Like, I don’t know Scoob” all evening.

    This was instantly shot down by my children.  Audra wanted to be a witch and Asher wanted to be Batman and nobody wanted to be the Scooby Doo character they were supposed to be anyway.  Audra wanted to be Scooby doo, even though Scooby is a boy and we needed the two females in our family to be Daphne and Velma. 

    I had assumed Audra would want to be Daphne because Daphne has long hair and wears dresses.  I mentioned this to my wife who was instantly offended.  “Why should I be Velma?  Why shouldn’t I be Daphne?”

    Woah.  No good way out of this one.

    “I was just trying to think of the children,” I said, with a disapproving look.

    Later I was talking with our daughter Audra about who should be what character and she said that she wanted to be Scooby, I should be Fred, and Mommy should be Velma. 

    Trying to be my wife’s defender, I said “Why should Mommy be Velma?  Why shouldn’t she be Daphne?”

    Audra looked at me like I was stupid.  “Hello!  The hair, the glasses…. she looks just like her!”

    Yes, I’m afraid the truth is that for better or for worse, my beautiful wife is one  turtleneck and a pair of orange bobby socks away from passing for Velma at comic con.

    (disturbing side note:  I did a quick google search for Velma because I couldn’t remember exactly what she wore and I made a very disconcerting discovery.  Apparently there is a small but devoted tech-geek fan base out there that sees Velma as their ultimate nerd dream girl.  This would be fine in and of itself, but because they are tech-geeks they have altered some Velma images to, well, make her more, um, libidinous. Think Velma does a Maxim centerfold. 

    And I always thought that Velma was probably a …. Well, nevermind.)

    ANY! 

    WHO!

    So we weren’t going to dress up as Scooby Doo characters.  Which is sad, but inevitable.  So, I had to start combing through Halloween catalogs and websites to find costumes for the kids.  And this is where life started getting weird.

    I’m not sure I had ever looked through a Halloween catalog before.

    When I was a kid, there really weren’t that many options.  You just went down to K-mart and looked through the small selection of plastic jumpsuits and masks with a rubber band and chose whichever one had the most popular cartoon on tv that year.  Then you sweated to death in the non breathable plastic outfit until the rubber band on the mask broke 15 minutes into trick or treating and your mom promised to tape it back on if you would only stop crying, but that never really worked and the whole thing ended up in the trash within a couple hours of having put it on.

    Right?

    Now there are options.  Tons and tons of options.  I first realized this when Asher told me he wanted to be Batman.

    Ok, I thought, and then I started looking.  There are dozens of Batman costumes available for a 4 year old.

    You can have a scary, all black, Batman from the movie, or a grey and blue batman from the TV show, or a bold and brave batman from the cartoon.  These costumes come with or without fake muscles added on.  You can have full face masks or plastic strap on masks, or rubberized form fitting masks.  There are batarangs, and grappling guns and utility belts and everything else you could possibly want to make your batman costume bat-tastic!

    What must the poor people in Russia think standing in long lines just to choose between costumes of Lenin and Smurfs.

    Then I had the brilliant idea of having Micah dress up as Robin so my two boys could be Batman and Robin.  So I did a search and found this picture:

    Good heavens, what is wrong with that kid.  I’ve never seen a child who looked so much like a simpering fifty year old.  I imagine that this is what George Will looked like as a child.

    We got the costume anyway.

    But then I started looking through the rest of the catalog and came across the teen section.

    Here’s how the teen section works, there are virtually no costumes for guys (teen guys are too cool to wear costumes) but there is an endless number of costumes for girls.

    Now I don’t know what you think your teenage daughter is going to wear as a Halloween costume, but whatever image came into your mind (lawyer, gypsy, gangster) just add the adjective “sexy” in front of it and you’ll about have it right. 

    For teen costumes they have just taken every single normal costume idea and made it sexy.  So you don’t go as a policeman.  You go as a sexy policeman.  You don’t go as Wonder Woman, you go as sexy push-up bra wonder woman.  And if you want to go as something wholesome and innocent like Alice in Wonderland, you can’t.  You go as sexy Alice in Wonderland.

    Think I’m joking?

     

    Wonderland indeed.

    And even more disturbing (at least on a conceptual level) are the bizarre mash up costumes. 

    For instance there’s the “Robin Da Hood” costume.  Which is sort of like a sexy rap gangsta’ version of Robin Hood with a corsette.  (I know)
    http://www.halloweenexpress.com/robyn-hood-sexy-adult-costume-p-18663.html

    Or

    “Sexy Mistrees Pirate” Costume – because sexy pirate wasn’t enough.  She also had to be a philandering mistress.  Very naughty.
    http://www.halloweenexpress.com/sexy-mistress-pirate-adult-costume-p-18261.html

    Or the

    “Scooby Doo Vampire” costume.  I mean, what is that exactly?  And why would anyone want to be a Scooby Doo vampire and why is it sold out?
    http://www.halloweenexpress.com/scooby-doo-vampire-adult-costume-p-7143.html

    Or the

    “Secret Wishes Ghostbusters” costume.  I’ll give you one guess as to what the secret wish is.
    http://www.halloweenexpress.com/secret-wishes-sexy-ghostbuster-adult-costume-p-13239.html

    Or

    “Lil’ Dead Riding Hood” which is sort of a Zombie / red riding hood / serial killer  / sexy ah…. Forget it, I think you just need to see this one.

     


    Now, don’t get me wrong.  I’m sure there’s a place for costumes like these.  (Key  parties?)  And I wouldn’t personally be opposed to my wife picking a couple out (she had no interest what so ever in the princess Leia prisoner bikini – whatever!) but it does disturb me a little bit that so many of these seemed to be geared toward teenagers, or heck even college students for that matter.

    In fact, call me conservative, but I don’t think anyone who has been married less than 10 years ought to be buying these costumes.  Let’s face it.  10 years in you might need a sexy wishes Ghostbuster to zap some life into the marriage, but up until then you’re probably fine just being a plain old regular ghostbuster.

    But maybe I’m just a prude. 

    A fuddy duddy.

    Maybe I’m no better than the cranky librarian who doesn’t want your kid to check out those racy Sweet Valley High books.  But if that’s the case…

    I can at least be a sexy librarian

     

    Hope they have it in my size.

  • Science is Fun! And Other Lies

     

    Sometime last year I wrote a blog about Chik-fil-a  and their absolute inability to put toys in their kids meal that aren’t incredibly lame.  (I believe I titled the blog “Chik-fi-lame”  Pretty clever, huh?)

    The article I wrote was witty, insightful and full of helpful criticisms and inspiring suggestions.  However, I have bad news.

    It didn’t work.

    Despite the dozens of people who read that blog, apparently Chik-fil-a still seems hell bent on manufacturing useless, boring, plastic schlock that kids instantly throw in the trash (or if they are wearing Birkenstocks – into the recycling).

    Last week we showed up at “the Chik,” (as us cool people call it) and the kids all settled in to their meal of chicken parts.  After they had dipped breaded giblets in various sauces one of them came over and handed me their “toy.”

    “Daddy, can you open this for me?”

    I looked at it.  Apparently, chik-fil-a (always trying to provide toys that are educational) had decided to team up with a company that made science experiment kits to provide mini experiments in their kids meal.

    This is a great idea. 

    Kids love science experiments.  They love the magical aspect of science that causes yellow liquids to turn green and white powder to explode into mountains of foam.  There are so many great, simple and cheap, mini-experiments that chik-fil-a could include in their kids’ meals that would teach children a basic scientific principle, while allowing them to have fun.

    Chik-fil-a did not choose any of these.

    Chik-fil-a, God bless ‘em, decided to include plastic scientific tools like a beaker, or a graduated cylinder, or, as my children received, an “evaporation bowl.”  Do you know another name for an “evaporation bowl?

    Bowl.

    That’s right, it’s just a plastic bowl. 

    That’s it. 

    From the best I could tell (and mind you, I did not do real well in Chemistry) you would use an evaporation bowl to let things evaporate in.  Say for instance (and, yes, I am making this up) you wanted to see how much salt was in salt water, you could put some salt water in an evaporation bowl and after all the water evaporated you would be left with the salt and then you could measure it or something…. I guess…. maybe.

    Nothing kids like better than watching water evaporate until there’s some nasty crusty stuff left.

    So my kids got a bowl.

    For watching water evaporate.

    Next week:  The watching paint dry toy.

    I guess that’s better than the graduated cylinder which has a list of experiments that basically involve you using the cylinder to measure out water for something else.  For instance, measure out 30ml of water and put it in a cup filled with food dye you make from vegetables to make paint.  That’s a fine thing to do, but I don’t know how integral the graduated cylinder is to that process.

    Well, I tried to spin our toy as best I could.  “Hey kids,” I said, “we got a bowl!  We can eat cereal from it!”

    They weren’t real excited about this, considering that they already have bowls at home.  It’s sort of like saying, “Hey kids look!  New floor mats for the car!”

    Luckily, I didn’t have to worry too much about their apathy.  I took the bowls home where they promptly melted in the dishwasher.  So I threw them away (in the recycling, thank you very much).

    What truly annoys me is that it wouldn’t take much for Chik-fil-a to make these sad little toys not so lame.  If they want to do science stuff, why not have a small plastic volcano in the kids’ meals along with a tab of baking soda and a packet of vinegar they stole form Long John Silvers?

    That would be cool!

    Or how about a pack of three types of those chintzy foam airplane kits so kids could see how different shapes fly differently.  One flies farther, but one can fly in loops.

    Come on people, this isn’t complicated!  I took a class in college dubbed “physics for poets” and I can come up with ideas that are better than “evaporation bowl.”

    It’s hard when people don’t listen to you.

    So, let’s get it together Chik-fil-a.  I would love for my kids to get an “educational” toy in their kids meal.  I would love for them to connect learning with fun.  But right now all their connecting learning with is “totally boring” and “the recycling bin.”

    I would love for my kids to have an alternative to the McDonalds gender specific toys which right now are tee-iny build-a-bears that you don’t actually build for the girls and something called Bakugan for the boys – which appears to be some kind of two headed dragon who is friends with these little balls that open up and have the the ricin virus inside or something.  I don’t know.  It’s some kind of Japanimation manga nonsense.

    Sure, I’d love to give the kids something fun and educational instead of wacky corporate  toys, (Corporate America is bad – Ralph Nader said so) but come on.  Which is cooler?  A two headed dragon, or a bowl?

    Work with me people.

    And again, Chik-fil-a, my offer stands to take over your toy design department for a mid six-figures salary.  (Ok, the salary is negotiable)

    Education and fun don’t have to be mutually exclusive.

    But fun and evaporation bowls are.

  • Saved by the Nobel

     
    Rejoice Americans!

    Ok, so we didn’t get the Olympics.  Big deal.  The last thing Chicago needs is another huge stadium to hold all of its losing sports teams.  Besides, they probably would have just had a talking slice of pizza as the Olympic mascot. 

    Poppy the Pepperoni!

    Very embarrassing.

    No, forget the Olympics.  When it comes to international events, what the U.S. has to be proud of is our absolute domination in the Nobel Prizes.

    Economics!  Medicine!  Physics!  Chemistry!  Peace!  We Americans are absolutely destroying the competition.  Sure, we have had to share a couple of the prizes with the occasional outsider, but the good ol’ God Bless the U.S.A. has had a representation in every single one of the awards.

    Except for Literature. 

    Honest to Pete!  Did they seriously give the Literature prize to a German poet? 

    A German Poet?   What does that even look like?

    It is raining. 
    The sky is black.
    Will the sun come out?
    NEIN!”

    I mean come on!  Is that really the best Literature the world has to offer? 

    Oh, Nicholas Sparks, when will you get your due?

    Anyway.

    So, the U.S. has completely kicked butt in the Nobels  (suck on that Rio).  This is very exciting.  Because, after years and years of hearing about how our schools suck and we rank 400th in the world out of 300 countries and what not, it’s nice to see that our good ol’ American education system isn’t so bad after all. 

    You know what else?  I did a little research and all of our true blue patriotic Nobel winners have something else in common – they all went to public school.

    (Well, except for that guy who won the Peace Prize.  He only went to private schools….. schmuck.  I guess if you want to win the peace prize, it’s good to go to snooty private schools without any poor people or minorities….. )

    But my point is that all of our Nobel winners (arguably the smartest people in the nation) went to public school. 

    What is that about?

    We’re taught that private schools are best and that they produce our leaders and that public schools are where you go if you’re poor and want to contract diphtheria.  And yet, somehow, our public schools, which are ridiculed around the world in all of these international comparison tests, somehow seem to produce the top scientists in the world.

    (they produce crappy peacemakers and writers, but that’s not important)

    Did you ever wonder about that?  Why our apparently lousy school system seems to do such a great job producing a whole bunch of smart people?

    (Know how many Japanese won a Nobel this year?  Zero)

    Well, the answer to this conundrum has a couple of parts.

    The first part is that America does something crazy – something that almost no other country in the world does:

    We try to educate everbody.

    (I know…. what are we thinking?)

    From kindergarten to 12th grade we attempt to educate every person in this country to the same level.  No matter how dumb you are, no matter where you grew up, no matter how much Jim Beam your Mama drank while she was pregnant, our educational goal is to educate you to 12th grade and prepare you for college.

    Nobody else does this.

    Do you know why?  Because it’s really frickin’ hard.

    In most other “developed” countries children are segregated by academic ability at a young age.  As young as 4th grade, children are split into either the “could go to college” group, or the “could pick up trash on the side of the road” group.

    The potential college kids are wooshed off to elite college prep programs, the others are sent to trade schools or schools with considerably lower expectations and usually do not complete as many years of education.

    So when all those international comparisons come out that rank us 978th in Algebra, bear in mind that we are comparing 100% of our 10th graders with an elite fraction of other countries’ students.

    Hardly seems fair does it?

    The truth is we have some of the best public schools in the world.

    However, the truth is that we also have some of the worst. 

    That’s the reality in America.  In attempting to teach everyone exactly the same thing, we end up being wildly successful with some kids and doing an absolute piss poor job with others. 

    There is little doubt in my mind that our public schools and certainly our nation’s universities (public and private) are the best in the world.  That is not mere patriotic posturing  (I’m a liberal, we don’t do that) it’s just a fact.  England’s got a couple of half-decent schools and there may be a handful more in some other countries, but the truth is that, as a whole, our Universities are at the top of the heap.

    We know how to take smart middle class kids and educate them to the fullest of their potential better than any other country in the world and don’t let anyone tell you differently.

    The problem is that we do an absolutely abysmal job in educating those kids that struggle in school. 

    Unlike other countries, we attempt to teach everyone, but the reality is, we don’t.  In our efforts to give our most damaged citizens the same education as our most supported, we end up providing very little education at all.

    Please don’t misunderstand me.  I am not for one second suggesting that what we need to do is adopt our European neighbors’ policy of academic segregation.

    The great thing about American education is that it is designed so that anyone from anywhere can excel to its highest ranks.  The problem is that this almost never happens, and on the rare occasions that it does, it becomes an Oprah movie of the week.

    We believe that we have an egalitarian system when, in fact, it is egalitarian only by design, not by results. 

    The flip side of believing that everyone is created equal is the belief that everyone is created equal - when any sociologist will tell you that this is not true.  Many of our least fortunate citizens are born into circumstances that are in no way comparable to the average middle class child and yet we like to tell ourselves that they both have the same chances – that their future paths are similar, if only they would work hard enough.  Then we hold up that one-in-a-million exception as proof that the system works.

    We need to accept the fact that our educational system is perfectly crafted to produce precisely what it is currently producing: some of the smartest people in the world and some of the most hopeless. 

    There are no easy answers here.  The problems with our educational system have more to do with the problems of inequality in our society than they do with any particular educational agenda. 

    We need to accept the reality that we are not all born into equal circumstances and that this fact must be taken into consideration when designing our educational programs.

    Should we still attempt the impossible?  Should we ignore the dispassionately logical model of our international peers and continue the crazy plan of attempting to educate every child to the same 12th grade level of college preparation?

    Hell yes.

    The European method is pragmatic.  It recognizes disparity and capitulates to it.  It essentially says, “you kids don’t seem to have a chance, so let’s not beat around the bush.”

    That is the antithesis of the American perspective.  It’s one of the reasons we left those soggy, elitist, german poetry writers behind a few hundred years ago and set off for new lands.

    Yes, American absolutely should continue to try to educate everyone, but we have to first realize that educating everyone to the same level, does not mean we educate everyone in the same way.  It is not possible to achieve the same results through the same means with different children with different needs.

    It seems like it should be… that’s a very American belief, but it is simply not accurate.

    We need to recognize the very real challenges involved with educating those children who come to school unprepared, unloved and uninspired.

    In the same way that every Scientist who has ever won a Nobel prize has understood that he or she needed to find a different approach to a problem, we as a nation need to recognize that we will make no new breakthroughs to our educational problems by attacking them in the same way we always have. 


    Our country has always sought to attempt the impossible.  We are dreamers – with the rare advantage of having the brains and finances and determination to see those dreams come true.

    We are unique in that we value education not just for some, but for all.

    Now, we simply need to prove that this value is more than just something we claim to believe, but something we are willing to work to see happen.

    Our public schools are the best in the world.  And I’ve got 6 Nobel Prize winners who are sure to agree with me. 

    And one private school peacenik who probably thinks so too.

  • Another Day, Another Death

     

    I’m sure most of you have already heard about Derrion Albert.  He was that poor kid in Chicago who, by all accounts, got sucked into a violent street brawl and died as a result of being hit in the head by a two by four.

    It’s not a story I’ve followed.

    I automatically tend to turn away from these most horrific of news stories:  the children found dead in an apartment, the girl kidnapped and locked in a shed, the teenager missing in Aruba.

    I understand why they are on the news.  They are tragic and shocking.  But somehow, following every detail of these grisly crimes seems a little closer to voyeurism than it does to informing myself about the news of the world.

    In general, these stories that reveal the very worst of humanity, end up doing little more than eating away at my soul.

    So I don’t watch.  I’d rather read an article that outlines new proposals for dealing with poverty and violence than to read about one more child found dead in a housing project.  I’ve already seen plenty of pain in the world.  I don’t need to gorge on it.

    But this story intrigued me because of its staying power.  I remember seeing it pop up on the news headlines and I looked away, saddened.  One more terrible crime in a country and world filled with them.  But then it popped up the next day, and the next. 

    There were opinion pieces in the newspaper and on TV.  People were marching in the streets and the President sent the Secretary of Education and Attorney General to Chicago to express their outrage.

    What was going on?

    I really don’t mean this to sound callous, so hear me out, but what made this case so special?

    I’ve taught in poor areas in Mississippi and Washington, DC and Detroit.  I got to know a lot of the families in these communities and as horrible as the Derrion Albert story is, I’ve heard it dozens of times before – not from the TV news – but from parents and nephews and friends of the victims who told me, first hand, how their uncle is in jail, or their cousin got shot, or their sister was raped by mom’s new boyfriend.

    I, in no way, want to diminish the horrific events surrounding Derrion Albert’s death.  But what made this case so special?

    I have two 20 year old former students of mine from Mississippi living with me right now while they try to pursue jobs and college.

    These two young black men are from a tiny rural town in the middle of the Mississippi Delta.  It is an impoverished community where most people live in appalling conditions and the statistics on poverty, infant mortality, crime, teen pregnancy, and unemployment consistently rank among the worst in the nation.

    It is a community of 2,000 people sitting in the midst of soybean and cotton fields, but in many ways, it is much more like the slums of Chicago, than the bucolic rural areas most of us imagine.

    We were sitting at the dinner table a few weeks ago when one of the boys told us about an incident in their town that he had just heard about from a friend.

    Apparently, there is a guy in Mississippi who has bought an old school bus and charges local kids a few bucks to take them to a skating rink 30 minutes away.  Normally he only picks up kids from one community at a time because the inter-community rivalries can be intense. 

    In the midst of rural towns with nothing to be proud of, pride has to come from geography alone.  The High Schools are full of tales of whole groups of kids getting in fights for no other reason than they were from one tiny little town or the other.  And if you get in a fight with one community member, you get in a fight with all of them.

    On this occasion, however, Raphael Frison, a boy from a neighboring community, was visiting his grandmother and got on the bus with all of his geographic enemies.  Well, this was discovered and something got said and before you know it, there was a fight – one boy against a bus load.

    From here, the details are fuzzy.  Did Raphael jump off the bus?  Was he pushed?  No one seems sure.  My students assured me, that if it were them, they would definitely have jumped off the bus rather than risk taking on a busload of opponents.

    Regardless, Raphael jumped or was pushed out of the back emergency exit of the bus.  The bus was driving down the highway at the time, probably doing 60 or 70.  It took several minutes for the bus driver to realize something had happened and to turn around. 

    You see, fights are pretty common.

    By the time they found Raphael Frison, lying limp and bloody on the side of the road, he was dead.

    This did not happen in a big city.  It happened in a small nothing of a town in Mississippi.  It didn’t even make most of the local papers.

    Just one more black kid dying over something stupid.

    Hardly even news, is it?

    So, I ask again, what made Derrion Albert so special?

    I’ve asked several people and what they have all told me is that this case was different because there was videotape of the incident.

    Because there was videotape……

    Is that because, if we can’t see it for our own eyes, we don’t believe that it really happened?  That, somehow, the images in our mind of an innocent boy being bludgeoned to death by a board don’t seem significant, but a grainy, unfocused video taken with a cellphone is enough to draw the highest leaders in government to descend on Chicago and declare in tones of outrage that “this has to stop!”

    Did people really not believe that this kind of thing was going on?  Was this a shock to people?  Were people surprised that teenagers drowning in a morass of poverty and neglect have reverted to unthinking violence to settle the pettiest of incidents.

    Anyone who has lived or worked among the poor in this country didn’t need a grainy video to reveal this fact.  They have seen or heard these stories over and over again.

    So far this year, almost 150 youth in Chicago under the age of 25 have been murdered.

    150!

    Over 1500 people under the age of 18 were murdered in the United States last year.

    One thousand and five hundred!

    So, I ask again, what made Derrion Albert, as awful as it was, so unbelievably special?

    It never makes sense.  It is always a tragedy.  In each incidence, it is a waste of human potential.  And yet it continues, day in and day out. 

    In cities large and small, children are dying because, as a society, we refuse to acknowledge what is happening all around us, until one grainy video appears and forces us to accept that horrible things are happening right down the street and we aren’t doing a damn thing about it.

    So, what is it that makes Derrion Albert so special?

    Unfortunately….

    Nothing.

     

  • As Seen on TV

     I recognize that commercials are a necessary evil.

    I enjoy TV.  My kids enjoy TV.  It’s a, generally, positive thing in our life.  And I understand that to pay for the TV, there has to be commercials (this doesn’t really explain my cable bill, but we’re going to let that go for the moment.)

    My problem isn’t so much for myself.  Ever since the DVR came into our life I don’t really watch commercials.

    No, my concern is for the children.

    Why does it always have to hurt the children the most?

    Children’s television is just chock full of commercials.  Dora can’t get halfway through the stupid magic forest without needing to take a break to ply the kids with a new cereal or some dancing doll. 

    Luckily, our family has been fortunate in the fact that our kids don’t watch much TV.

    Oh, don’t get me wrong.  I’m not one of these holier than thou, my kids never watch TV because they’re always sitting around reading Sartre in the original French and reenacting their favorite scenes from Ibsen, folks.  (I hate those people…. Don’t you?)

    No, it’s just that my kids watch most of their programming in our van.

    I have always said that after women, and possibly cheese, the in-car DVD player was God’s greatest creation.  (And on the 8th day, God created headphones so parents could listen to something else while their children watched Scooby Doo episodes.)

    Honestly, if you have kids and you do not have an in car DVD player, get up right now and go get one.  When they are in the car watching that 9 inch TV is the only time I have any peace in my life.  It is literally the only time that the children are not talking (to each other, or themselves, or the wall) and that I can actually hear myself think (which explains the incoherence of so many of my blogs). 

    Besides it allows me to indoctrinate them with the quality programming of my youth – Looney Tunes, Smurfs, Animaniacs, Tom and Jerry, Superfriends (remember Gleek the monkey?).  I can’t wait till Asher’s old enough to enjoy an episode of Thundercats.

    So, anyway, my point is that we drive enough places that I don’t see the need for them to watch a whole lot of TV at home, because they’ve already soaked up enough mind numbing nonsense in the car.  But, of course, there are times when the kids do get to watch TV in the house. It normally happens if they are fighting a little too much and I need to pacify the wild beasts or on Saturday morning.   I have always believed that it is a child’s God given right to watch cartoons on Saturday morning. 

    But there is a problem.

    With every episode of Phineas and Ferb (great show, it’s got a freakin’ secret agent Platypus for crying out loud) or the Suite Life on Deck, or even some old school Dudley Doright, there are commercials.

    And as it turns out, my kids are absolute idiots when it comes to commercials.  They’re like that little girl in Poltergeist with her hands on the TV.

    “Yes, master, I will do whatever you say.  If you command me to ask for Minimates or, Cocoa Puffs, or Scrubbing Bubbles Toilet Cleaner, I shall indeed beg and whine until it has been purchased.”

    Honestly, it doesn’t matter how stupid the toy is, if it was seen on TV and advertised with an exciting voice, my kids want it.

    They are that malleable.

    Not by me, mind you, but malleable nonetheless.

    We were walking through Target last week and Audra started squealing like a pig with a magical spider writing stuff over its head:

    “Daddy!  Daddy!  Look!  It’s Chixos!”

    I did not, as I was inclined, say, “What the hell are Chixos?” 

    But I thought it.

    It turns out, Chixos are chintzy solid plastic dolls that are about three inches tall and don’t move.  They don’t bend, you can’t dress them, and their hair is painted on.  Essentially, they are the lamest toy ever created.  The one gimmick is that you can take the head or torso off one and stick it on another.   They are essentially sassy legos, but without any moving parts or potential creativity.

    http://www.chixos.com/

    I imagine it is the kind of toy that was created in 1965 when they were still trying to figure out how not to make toys so lame.

    Heck, Barbie came out in 1959 and her arms and legs moved.

    Anyway, Audra loves her some Chixos.  Really wants some chixos.  I don’t know what the heck she would ever do with them if she were to receive them, since they don’t actually do anything, but boy does she want them.

    Advertisers often complain that it’s hard to convince people to buy things with their 30 second ads.  Adults maybe, but my kids would buy a bag of garbage if it had been painted pink, had a cartoon character slapped on the side and been advertised on TV.

    “Hey Kids!  Get your very own bag of garbage!  You’ll never know what you’ll find inside!  There could be old tissues, an empty potato chip bag with a few crumbs left in the bottom and maybe even an old Chixo that someone got bored with and threw away!  And if you order now, we’ll throw in, (for free!) a 2nd bag of garbage from the bathroom!”

    Next thing I know, the kids are begging for Mattell Brand’s Bag O’ Garbage.

    Yesterday, I bought the kids some yogurt at Sam’s.  I know that the “kids yogurt” is not as healthy as the organic, gluten free yogurt made with only the finest hand milked goat cream, but I still figure that eating yogurt as a snack has got to be a million times better than most of the other junk out there.

    Anyway, I apparently bought a case of yogurt that has been heavily advertised on the magic talking box.  To be specific, I bought “Danimals Crush Cups” yogurt.  I know this because as soon as I walked in the door, the kids shouted:

    “Wow!  Daddy got Danimals Crush Cups!”

    Actually Asher said, “Wow! Daddy got Da Animals Crush Cowps!”  And could not be convinced that this was not their name.

    For those of you without children, or without TVs, or without grocery stores,  (We have all of our groceries delivered by bicycle in glass jars from an organic farm co-op in Vermont, don’tcha know) Danimals Crush Cups are regular old yogurt (if you can call “Strawberry Smash!” and “Blueberry Blast!” regular) that is in a special weird little cup that you can squeeze.  When you squeeze the cup, the yogurt smooshes to the top, for you to slurp up, thus relieving the need for a spoon, or any manner of civility.

    So, as a parent, you get the kids to eat yogurt, and the kids get to use violence to extract said yogurt.

    It’s a win / win for everyone.

    What concerned me though was that after obtaining their first crush cups, the kids were so excited that they decided to act out the Danimals Crush Cups commercial.

    “Hey, Asher!  Let’s do the Danimals Crush Cups commercial!  You be the boy who doesn’t know what a Danimals Crush Cup is and I’ll be the boy who tells him all about it!”

    And then they spent the next 15 minutes acting out the commercial.

    Holy crap.

    (Here’s the original.  Imagine a 7 year old girl and a 4 year old boy who says “crush cowps” and you’ll get the general idea.)

    As a general rule I don’t tend to buy too much of the kid food that looks like more thought, money, and effort when into the marketing of it than the manufacture, but I’m not opposed to it either.

    I understand why companies do it, and I don’t mind the occasional gimmick.  If crushing a cup of yogurt makes it more exciting for my kids, then great.  But I am just absolutely disturbed by the influence these commercials seem to have over them.

    Would it be possible to get the Danimals Crush Cup people to teach multiplication?

    In a way, I understand.  I have to admit that I got excited when I saw the guy who played Beverly Leslie on Will and Grace walking in Dupont Circle.  It was that odd sensation, of “Hey!  I’ve done seen you on the TV box!” that doesn’t actually make any sense, but is oddly exhilerating.

    It’s the same reason that it’s kind of neat to see that bar in Boston where they filmed the street shots for Cheers, or why it was neat (but sad) to see John McCain last month leaving the airport in his 22 year old staffer’s 1998 Toyota Camry.

    There is something inherently exciting about seeing something in real life that you have seen on TV. 

    I don’t know why.

    But I think, for my kids, it is more or less this same kind of excitement of seeing things they have seen on TV appear for real life on the shelves at the store.  Just substitute Chixos for Beverly Leslie.

    So what to do?

    I know that some people’s reaction is to banish the TV altogether and I have sympathy for that.  But unless your kid is going to grow up to be an insufferable, anti-social dork with a doctorate in Early Elizabethan Historical Non-Fiction and no friends, at some point they’re going to be exposed to TV.

    And, I think that, as parents it’s partly our job to shield our kids from the more unseemly things in the world, but more importantly, it’s our job to show them how to deal with those unseemly aspects before they have to go out and learn how to deal with them on their own.

    It’s our job to teach our children how to understand, react to and respond to commercials in the same way it’s our job to teach them how to use the potty, be nice to friends and drive responsibly.

    Now, I don’t know exactly how to go about doing this, but part of it will be explaining to my chitlins why I think it’s ok to purchase, Danimals Crush Cups, why it’s not ok to constantly refer to them by their full advertising induced name, and why we are never in a million years going to buy those stupid Chixos.

    Our kids are going to be inundated with advertising for the rest of their lives and being able to sort out the good from the bad is probably one of the best lessons we could ever teach our children.  So….

    Just do it.

  • The Answer, My Friends…..

     
    I read an amazing story this morning.

    http://www.good.is/post/african-dynamo/?gt1=48001

    It was the story of William Kamkwamba, a young man from the African country of Malawi.

    (You may know Malawi as the country that Madonna’s always trying to adopt babies from!)

    Apparently, when William was 14, his family could no longer afford the $80 annual tuition to the local school and he had to drop out. 

    For just about anyone else on the planet, this would have been the end of the story. 

    William was different.

    He went to the local elementary school and talked the teacher into letting him check out books.  Among the books he found was one about alternative energy sources, particularly windmills. 

    William looked around at his small impoverished village.  There was no electricity, they were in the midst of a drought and the people of the village still had to walk for hours a day to bring water from the nearest well.  Although William was only 14 and had an education that was far from the best in the world, he understood that a windmill could change his tiny village in tremendous ways. 

    A windmill could pump water.  A windmill could provide light to read at night.  A windmill could power a radio.  For William, a windmill did not provide these things as luxuries.  If people could have light at night and did not have to spend hours merely obtaining water, they could spend that time improving their community.  They could plant vegetables and harvest a second round of crops.  As William wrote, “A windmill meant more than just power, it was freedom.”

    And so William got to work.  He picked through the trash, he scoured the cast offs from a nearby business.  He scraped together coins to purchase a handful of needed items.  And with the junk he found on the ground, William began constructing a windmill.

    As you might imagine, a young boy constructing a wooden structure out of scraps and trash and telling his neighbors that this contraption would create electricity, invited more than just a little ridicule.

    Think Noah.

    But William persevered and eventually he constructed a crude but operational windmill that did indeed create electricity.  He strung lights through his parents’ home and was able to power a radio for the community. 

    William literally brought his community out of darkness.

    The tale of William and his windmill spread, first to the school where he borrowed the books, and then to some people at a local school and through a series of events, William found himself as the subject of a book and eventually on his way to America to meet audiences who marveled at the accomplishments of a young boy from Africa.

    If you have 6 minutes in your day I hope you’ll take the time to watch this short movie about William.

     


    There is no question that William’s story is an inspiring story.  I dare say that what William accomplished is something that very few of us who grew up with electricity and grocery stores and excellent schools would have been able to accomplish.  He accomplished something that improved life in ways that his government, our government and a string of Peace Corps volunteers to the continent had been unable to.  And that’s what makes William’s story so remarkable.  He is one in a million.  Maybe one in a billion.

    And I think that is probably the important thing to remember about William.

    We all love these extraordinary stories of people who overcame adversity.  We love the tale of Liz Murray, the homeless girl who went to Harvard, or Ben Carson the kid from the inner city who became a pediatric neuro-surgeon, or William Kamkwamba the teenager from Africa who created electricity with his bare hands.

    These stories feel empowering.  They tell us that even in the midst of the horrors of this planet, there are amazing people doing amazing things.

    There is a darker side to this, however. 

    Sometimes the extraordinary tales of the exceptional can become an indictment of the ordinary.

    If one kid from the inner city can work hard and become a neuro -urgeon, why can’t they all?  Clearly the schools were good enough for Ben Carson to succeed.  What’s wrong with the rest of those kids?  Are they lazy?  Is it the fault of welfare?  Maybe inner city schools don’t need more money, maybe what they need is a better work ethic.

    If one kid from Africa can teach himself to build a windmill, then how much support does Africa really need from the United States?  They just need to pull themselves up by their boot straps like William did.  Our country didn’t have electricity 100 years ago, and nobody helped us out.  We were just a country of Williams, working hard.

    The problem is that we are not a country of Williams.  We had one William, and his name was Thomas Edison.  The rest of us are just yokels who know how to screw in a lightbulb and think we created light.

    For those of us who grew up with electricity and a safe home and parents who loved us, it is easy to mistake our successes as accomplishments attributable only to ourselves.  When in fact, our paths were paved primarily by good fortune and the blessings of having been born where we were.

    William’s story is extraordinary, but it is not replicable.

    There is a reason they made a lifetime movie about that one homeless girl who went to Harvard – because it never happens.

    We hold up the one inner city kid who became a neuro surgeon as an example, but he’s not an example, he’s a one in a million miracle. 

    The fact that one person can accomplish something, does not mean that anybody can.  It is exceptional inherently because of the infrequency with which it happens.  

    If most of us were honest with ourselves, we would admit that if we had grown up like William, or Liz, or Ben, that we would have been much more likely to follow the routes of their peers than of the extraordinary lives that they created for themselves.  Most of us succeeded because the path was easy and because our will to succeed was installed by our parents long before it grew independently.

    Most of us like to believe that if we had grown up in dire poverty, that we would have still accomplished great things.  It is the lie we tell ourselves because it makes it easier to accept the American ideal that life is what you make it, not what you were born into.

    It is important to celebrate William and his accomplishments, but think how many more accomplishments others in Africa might accomplish if school was not something you had to pay for and if the per student expenditure was actually more than I spent on my daughter’s school supplies this year. 

    How many more windmills might have sprung up across Africa if only those children had the same opportunities that ours do.

    We should celebrate William for what he has done, but it is important to remember that he is the exception, not the rule and that right now William lives in an area where only the exceptions can succeed.

    What would happen if the paths for Williams’ peers, or Ben Carson’s peers, or Liz Murray’s peers were as easy as they were for me growing up? 

    We take for granted what we were freely given and then look down on those who struggled so much harder to accomplish so much less.

    The world is not fair, but that does not absolve us from our obligation to do whatever we can to help it become so.

    William can make electricity out of thin air. 

    What could he accomplish if he had more?

     

    Follow William’s Journey at his website:  http://williamkamkwamba.typepad.com    Also, William will be on the Daily Show (of all places) Wed. night October 7th.

  • Coming Up Live at 5! Pain! Misery! And Abject Stupidity!

     
    Is there anything worse than local TV news?

    I mean, really.  Anything?

    It’s sort of remarkable really.  Sometimes local newspapers can be good and sometimes they’re just worthless, but the local TV news is universally horrible.  It doesn’t matter whether you are watching the local news for some tee-iny city in North Dakota, or whether you are watching the local news in the largest city in the country.  From Chicago to Chenango .  It is always, always bad.

    The main reason is because they don’t actually have a lot of, well, news on their shows.  It’s more like a half hour of gossip.  You know, not the stuff that is actually important and would actually affect people’s lives, but instead, the stuff that just seems most horrible or most likely to make the audience gasp, or shake their head in disbelief while thinking “What is the world coming to?”

    Now, I suppose I should say up front, that I don’t actually watch the local TV news.

    There are a couple of reasons for this.

    1)  I’m not actually a senior citizen.

    2)  I like for my purveyors of news to actually purvey news

    3)  As I mentioned, it’s terrible, terrible, terrible.

    So, I don’t watch the news, which I suppose makes it somewhat unfair for me to write a blog talking about how bad it is, but I base this on the fact that I do occasionally watch commercials for the news and that on the rare occasions that I do watch local news, it is always wretched.

    This is what we call random sampling.  It’s what the smarty pants scientist peoples do.

    So I feel relatively confident in condemning the entire enterprise. 

    The commercials for the news truly are the worst.  It’s always something like:

    “Coming up tonight at 11:00!  A woman was killed by a rabid mountain line in her own bedroom!  We have the grizzly photographs!  Plus, a school field trip goes horribly wrong on a visit to the local sausage factory!  We have the grizzly footage!  And scientists reveal that there is something in your home that could kill you at any second!  We’ll tell you what it is and give you all the grizzly details in 2 hours!  And finally, clothes aren’t just for people any more!  This bear likes to put on dresses and dance to Barry Manilow songs!  We’ll show you all the grizzly footage tonight at 11:00!”

    Honestly, it’s just horrible.

    I feel like the ads for TV news should just be:

    “Tonight!  We will show you the 5 most horrible things that have happened in our city, plus one misleading story designed to scare you unnecessarily and one really asinine segment about small children, animals, or cheerleaders designed to make you slightly less depressed after watching all the other crap we just showed you.”

    I mean, that really is their programming model.

    Basically the nightly news is a list of all the murders that have taken place that day, any major fires that happened, any really bad car accidents, anything that might make people unreasonably angry, and anything that makes the news people seem like they are on “your side.” 

    Plus some really stupid stuff at the end of the show, usually about a kid winning an award, or some crippled guy winning a race so that the show ends on a basically happy note.

    The message of the nightly news is essentially:

    The world is a terrible, scary place where horrific things happen to good people all the time, but there’s still a little bit of hope because Timmy won the science fair, and Timmy doesn’t have any legs.

    You think I’m making all of this up don’t you?  Well, let’s just take a brief survey of some of the idiocy on the local news today.  And consider with each story, does it seem more like news, or the kind of horrible gossip you might share while waiting at the bus stop.

    “DC Woman’s Dog Mauled by Pitt Bulls.”

    Now, this is horrific, and I’m darn sure, they have some grizzly footage (what do you bet it’s of blood stains on the sidewalk) but is it news?  I don’t think so.  This would barely be news in a neighborhood.  “Hey, did you hear that Darryl’s Pitt Bull attacked old widow Jenkin’s Pekinese?”  But in a region of several million, this isn’t news, it’s just something that happened that’s kind of gross and scary and feeds into stereotypes and fears that people already have.

     

    Or how about this one:

    “Body Found in Fire Stricken Home”

    Well, that’s just awful.  It really is.  Is it news, though?  I don’t know.  Maybe in a rubbernecking, look at how bad that car wreck is kind of way?  Is it more newsworthy because the lady died in a fire than if her body had been found after a heart attack or falling down the steps?  I guess so, maybe, although I’m not sure why.

     

    How about this one?

    “Dogs Blamed for Starting House Fire”

    Is this news?  Yes, but only if the dogs were pitt bulls.

     

    Here are some other fun headlines from the morning:

    “High School Girlfight Gone Viral Concerns Parents”  (basically two teens got in a fight.  But this is news, because it includes the newsworthy words “girlfight” and “viral”)

    “Morning Prostitutes Working DC Streets”  (This is news only if you live under a rock)

    “Services Held in Quadruple Shooting”  (this is news only if you like to continue to be depressed about something that was horribly depressing last week)

    “Businesses Still Not Hiring”  (this is news essentially saying that we don’t have any new news to tell you)

    “Bra Doubles as Gas Mask”  (I don’t know what this is, but it does involve breasts and allusions to terrorism, so I guess it’s definitely news)

    “55 Year Old Woman Pulls 80 Ton Plane”  (This may be the most newsworthy thing I’ve seen this morning)

    “Magic Johnson Visits Kids at DC Schools” (this is news only if your kid went to whatever school this was, otherwise, it’s news in the same way that “man at grocery store holds open door for old lady” is news.  So……not news.)


    Ok, so local news is kind of dumb.  Honestly, I don’t think that’s actually news to anyone (hmmmm, irony?)

    So why should you care. 

    Why did I even bother to write about this except to make fun of some stories and to ensure that you will all google “Bra doubles as gas mask” as soon as your done reading?

    (I’ve saved you the time.  The the link is here:   http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/offbeat/dpgo_Bra_Doubles_as_Gas_Mask_mb_20091004_3863452 )

    Well, I’ll tell you why.

    We live in a culture where people tend to be uninformed.  Lots of people don’t read a newspaper or watch the news, and those that do are getting a somewhat skewed view of the world thanks to “Guy Smiley – Live at 5 and On Your Side!”

    If you’ve ever wondered why your grandmother is so nutty and thinks the world is going to hell in a handbasket and is scared to travel downtown where all “those people” are, it’s because of the evening news.  When all people see on the news is a world filled with dog attacks, fires, car accidents, murders and angry, uninformed “people on the street” spouting off their opinions to the camera, you tend to up with a pretty skewed view of the world.

    But boy that Magic Johnson seems like a nice fellow.

    I don’t think that the news should avoid stories of death and mayhem, but I do think it’s important to put them in perspective and to not only report the most sensational aspects of those stories. 

    When all is said and done, the sad quality of the local news is little more than just a pet peeve of mine. 

    I understand that the news is a profit driven enterprise.  Local news is only here to get as many people to watch as possible and, unfortunately, we, the people, all seem the most enthralled by fires and murders.  (I assume that’s why we all love Law and Order and medical shows so much.)

    But the truth is news is not entertainment.  Or at least it shouldn’t be.  It should be a venue to inform us, to educate us about our community and to help make us better citizens, not less informed citizens - not more frightened citizens - not angrier citizens.

    And certainly not the kinds of citizens who want to purchase a bra / gas mask.

    That’s just wrong.

  • 25 Random Things About Me

     
    So, the Facebook has this thing where you’re supposed to post 25 Random things about yourself.

    Ok, I don’t actually know if that’s true or not.  I had a friend who did it once and she said that it was a thing.  I have no idea.  My friend could be perfectly insane and manufacturing this in her own head. 

    Nonetheless, I liked the idea.  I learned several new things about my friend (including the fact that as a child she didn’t have her “own underwear.”  It was all communal) and so I found the exercise to be amusing, enlightening and somewhat disturbing all at the same time.

    So I decided to do the same.   Sit back and relax and prepare to learn 25 random things about me.

    Oh, and by the way, please don’t judge.


    1. A friend and I once got lost in the woods for about 5 hours on a church retreat.  Finally I stumbled across this old house in the woods.  I didn’t want to go up to the door because I was afraid they would kill us and write “FED” across our chest, but my friend insisted on knocking.  And much to my pleasant surprise, they gave us a lift back to the church lodge, where no one seemed to have noticed that we had been gone for the entire afternoon.

    2. I have a birthmark on my right buttock shaped like Puerto Rico

    3. In middle school I did this experiment where I measured the amount of oxygen trout needed to survive.  I did this by turning the pump off and waiting for the trout to go belly up.  I then would turn the pump back on and revive them, because I was kind of a wuss.

    4. In the late 90s I bought my first car, a 1986 Celica.  I tried to convince my wife, friends and students that a Celica was a sports car, but no one believed me.  My students all referred to it as “a dune buggy” which was not entirely accurate, or nice, but summed up everyone’s opinion accurately.

    5. I was born with 11 fingers

    6. The best I can remember, I have moved 17 times.  And, no, my dad wasn’t in the army.  Well, he was in the army, but that was before I was born.

    7. I don’t really like chocolate.  I like it on stuff, like reese’s cups, or mixed in to ice cream or in hot cocoa.  But a Hershey bar doesn’t really do anything for me.

    8. In High School I once convinced a friend that I had seen a ghost of a murdered little girl on the side of the road and she stayed up all night freaking out.

    9. When I was one, I had surgery to remove a finger from my right hand.  It was a real finger with a bone and everything and now the pinky on my right hand is significantly smaller than the pinky on my left.

    10. I am publically disdainful of Josh Groban but secretly jealous of his voice.

    11. There was a period of time where I had a crush on this painting. 
    http://www.1st-art-gallery.com/thumbnail/46055/1/Mlle-Irene-Cahen-Danvers.jpg 
    I thought she was so beautiful and I wanted to marry someone as delicate and as beautiful as she was.  And then I grew up and married a tomboy soccer player. 

    12. I once got fired from a nanny job after two weeks because I baked a cake and the parents thought I must be gay.

    13. I was elected homecoming King my sophomore year in High School. (Yes, there is more to that stor)

    14. When I was 19, I worked the 4 am to noon shift at Hardees.  (And, yes, they do make the biscuits from scratch)  I still remember the time one of the managers told me that I cleaned the front door glass better than anyone else (the secret is using lots of paper towels!)

    15. When I was 7, I decided to surprise my parents by making them breakfast in bed.  When I came in to their room they were very upset.  I never understood why.  Then, many years later when I was sitting in freshman math, it dawned on me that they had been having sex. 

    16. I failed freshman math.

    17. The best pizza I ever had was a pepperoni pizza from dominos that I had when I was 17.  It was 1:00 a.m. and I sat on the floor of a crowded dorm room at a summer theater program with some friends who I have never seen since.

    18. I sometimes wish that I still had my 11th finger because I secretly believe I could have been the world’s greatest piano player even though I probably would have ended up single and shunned by society and the subject of an X-files episode.

    19. I “accidentally” got admitted to a graduate education program on full scholarship without having a valid teaching certificate.  I ended up taking 32 credits a semester at 3 different schools to rectify the situation.

    20. My junior year in college I spent a semester abroad in London.  I didn’t have any money, so I volunteered to accompany an elderly woman to an island in Scotland that was supposed to be an ancient spiritual retreat.  It turned out she was on Lithium and had not prepared for the trip and we were stranded for two days on an island with no money until we borrowed some cash from a local shop keeper so I could take the bus and two ferries back to the mainland and withdraw $400 on my credit card to get us back home.

    21. I have 13 albums by Barbra Streisand, but only one by Dave Matthews.

    22. In High School, I drove a 1977 Chrysler New Yorker and on the weekends I would tie a pair of bull horns on to the grill and drive around town with my friends listening to Billy Joel on a portable CD player that was hooked into a cassette adapter that was plugged into an 8 track adapter that was fitted into the car’s built in stereo system.

    23. My first girlfriend was named Ceily and we went to Kindergarten together and one time when she came over for dinner we kissed inside my batcave tent for almost 2 seconds.

    24. We had 12 bridesmaids at my wedding and no groomsman which seemed like a perfectly fine idea until I was sitting alone in a classroom in the church basement putting on my tux while 12 people attended to my wife.

    25. The best Christmas I ever had was the year I asked for an X-wing fighter and a tie-fighter.  It was all I wanted in the whole world.  When Christmas morning rolled around, I was thrilled that Santa had brought me the X-wing fighter, but secretly devastated that I didn’t get the tie-fighter.  I felt guilty for wanting it and being so sad, but I couldn’t help myself.  Then, the last present I opened was from my aunt and it was the tie-fighter.  I couldn’t believe that it had worked out so perfectly and for years couldn’t figure out how Santa could possibly have known that my aunt was getting that for me.  Then one day, many years later, when I was sitting in math class…….

     

FO Home | About Us | Advertise | Contact Us

“Families ONLY” | 10410 Kensington Parkway | Suite 216 | Kensington MD 20895 | 301.946.9777 | 301.986.9766 (FAX)

©Copyright 2007 Families ONLY, All rights reserved.